// console.log(spanner.next(75)); // 输出4（正确）
Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
。爱思助手下载最新版本对此有专业解读
Фонбет Чемпионат КХЛ
Template library
。关于这个话题，heLLoword翻译官方下载提供了深入分析
Овечкин продлил безголевую серию в составе Вашингтона09:40
第九十八条 询问笔录应当交被询问人核对；对没有阅读能力的，应当向其宣读。记载有遗漏或者差错的，被询问人可以提出补充或者更正。被询问人确认笔录无误后，应当签名、盖章或者按指印，询问的人民警察也应当在笔录上签名。，更多细节参见Line官方版本下载